views of common man
bloodshed who to be blamed
During recent uprising,we witnessed lakh of people on street,
and 50 under earth.with 50 valuable life being killed we are
no where to solution.Is srinagar muzaffarabad road compensation of 50 lives,
did they gave their life for sake of trade.outcome of recent uprising is going
tofrustate youth,and can lead to more dark era of kashmir history
probably kashmiri taliban in making.who is to be blamed for all this
common answer will be politicain but are they really responsible for this
bloodshed.let me clear i m nt here to justify anyone but to share my view.
politicain are to be blamed but what make them to think
perhaps do that.Who make them leader WE THE PEOPLE.Are they
worth so much appreciattion think logically rather emotionally we are all so
much emotionally attached to word AZAADI,But how many of us really know
what azzadi stands for.lakh of people participated in recent marches
they all shouted we want freedom on returning back home.they were
usual seen debating how come india will give us freedom,can our land sustain
as independent nation.Most of them do listen to leaders,chant slogan
so loudly and then because of criticism property of kashmiri they dont beleivein their leaderrship.why dont they believe them is out of freedom
of peice of this writing and i want to get appreciatting for my
writing rather than been critisized just like leaders ,as
they only talk what people like not what is the situation.they should
talk about how we will sustain after independence,wat will happen to
minority section as kashmir is no more a political but a relegiousissue made by our leader.these leaders politically do represent none but
relegiuosly they are representing millions.so made kashmir issue a
relegious,to quinch their own leadership thirst and to jump in kashmir
leadership whirlpool which wont have possible without sayin yahaan kya chalega
nizame mustafa.our leader are advocating right of self determination it will
be surprising only few know the meaning and consequences of right of self
determination i can bet hardly 10-12% knows the meaning of right of self
determination.
Self-determination is defined as free
choice of one’s own acts without external compulsion, and especially
as the freedom of the people of a given territory to determine their
own political status or independence from their current state.
The latter is a complex concept with conflicting definitions and
legal criteria for determining which groups may legitimately claim
the right to self-determination.Are leaders asking for right of
self determination of common man.wat will be fate of these people
who dont support freedom or dont support islamic constituition or
wat we call nizame mustafa.lakhs of people listening to leaders
speech on different venue do prove they represent masses and i have no
doubt in this rather umar abdullah dont have as he said they
(mainstream leaders) wont be able to gather so much crowds seperatist
did on eid gah chalo during program on indain news channel though
being baised telecasted that hats off for them.but are they really
deserving this much support because as some where i hv heard abt with
more power there comes more responsiblity.
On pampore march i heard one leader of hurryat i
dont think there is need of mentioning his name,saying usama se rishta
kya and seeking for answer from his supporters,do kashmir issue have
any rishta with usama.what made him think about usama when uprising
was totally indeginious.next day co ordination committee held
meeting at rajouri kadal and some onewho participated in election and lost,
then talked abt nationhood was also invited in the meeting.this gives me
thinking that seperatist are not leaders who want freedom but another lobby
of politician just like nc,pdp.they dont want to loose any of there member
even mohalla or kocha leader no matter how badly they hv affected the sacred
cause.
with about 50 people under earth,abt 1 million on road we are yet to
understand meaning of right of self determination.one of the important
and epitome leader of present time is yet to decide,that whether he
want freedom or pakistan,remember hum pakistani hai pakistan hamara
hai.sameleader apologizing latter is act of generiousity but wat i
said with more power there comes more responsiblities.one important
political face not relegious(important to mention here) of kashmir
revolution is usually critisized for being owner of hotel in commercial hub
of kashmir if it is wrong he should come out and make it clear to people.
i remember his slogan also ess par bhi lenge azaadi uss parr be lenge azaadi,
are we ready to accept people of other part as our people, in a state where
rural people dont like urban and urban dont like rural,then how cum
we can think of rejoining two parts.
one of the important leader of today mainstream
politics,once said,kashmir is atoot ang(integral part) of india when he was minister at centre during ab vajpayee s rule,and recently after massive uprising,he said in a program of news channel,that if azzadi is on table i m ready to talk.how can we praise a person who during his party's tenure say kashmir is attot anng(integral part)of india and other time wants to talk on azzadi.this is petty politics.and this irrational and unplanned appraoch of our
leader have killed almost one lakh people.
Do all these leader deserve that much support.the question
we should ask ourselves we are perhaps surrendering ourselves to them not only ourselves but our future generation to them do they really have that much caliber.Its like andhu mein kana raja,situation is somewhat like that.
we are so much emotionally attached to azzadi that anyone can make use
of our sentiments to make entry in elite lobby of so called leaders.
beaware of being fooled and being bitrayed by these leaders and howcome can people forget babs(sheikh abdullah) betreyal as it happened
only few decades back.wat made bab to betray kashmiri was the massive
support of people which actually he was not deserving.now who is to be
blamed for all this happened in kashmir.ya right WE THE PEOPLE.
